CRITIQUING
RESEARCH ARTICLES
(Use these questions for all
article critiques, Number and answer item-by-item;
not in prose form. You do not need to rewrite the questions.)
Answer the following questions yes or no and
explain your answer !
|
I
|
What type of research most accurately
describes this study?
Penelitian jenis apa yang paling akurat menggambarkan studi
ini?
|
|
II.
THE PROBLEM
|
NO
|
QUESTIONS:
|
TERTERA (Ya/Tidak)
|
PENJELASAN SEHARUSNYA
|
|
1
|
Was
the problem clearly
defined?
Apakah masalah didefinisikan dengan
jelas?
|
|
|
|
2
|
Were
hypotheses, research
questions, or objectives stated?
Apakah hipotesis, pertanyaan
penelitian, atau pernyataan obyektif?
|
|
|
|
3
|
Was the problem logically deduced from some theory?
Apakah masalah secara logis dideduksi
dari beberapa teori?
|
|
|
|
4
|
What is (are) the independent variable(s)?
Apa variabel independennya (s)?
|
|
|
|
5
|
What is (are) the dependent variable(s)?
Apa variabel dependennya?
|
|
|
III. DESIGN
|
NO
|
QUESTIONS:
|
TERTERA
|
SEHARUSNYA
|
|
1
|
Was
an appropriate research design utilized to answer the problem? Apakah desain riset yang tepat digunakan untuk menjawab masalah?
|
|
|
|
2
|
Was the population studied clearly specified? Apakah populasi ditentukan dengan jelas?
|
|
|
|
3
|
Were the sampling methods clearly outlined? Apakah metode sampling yang diuraikan
dengan jelas?
|
|
|
|
4
|
Was a control or comparison group chosen in the same
manner and from the
same population as the sample? Apakah
kontrol atau kelompok pembanding dipilih dalam cara yang sama dan dari
populasi yang sama sebagai sampel?
|
|
|
|
5
|
Were
the :reatments randomly assigned to the groups? Adakah treatments secara acak kepada kelompok-kelompok?
|
|
|
|
6
|
Did
the study include a replication? Apakah
studi termasuk replikasi?
|
|
|
|
7
|
Was
the alpha level specified a priori? Apakah tingkat alfa ditentukan a priori?
|
|
|
IV. THE PROCEDURE
|
NO
|
QUESTIONS:
|
TERTERA
|
SEHARUSNYA
|
|
1
|
Were treatments and/or data
collecting methods described so that you could replicate the study? Apakah treatmen dan / atau metode
pengumpulan data dijelaskan sehingga Anda bisa meniru studi?
|
|
|
|
2
|
Were the size and
characteristics of the sample adequately described? Apakah ukuran dan karakteristik
sampel cukup dijelaskan?
|
|
|
|
3
|
Were the treatments administered so that extraneous
sources of error were either held constant for all treatments and control groups
or randomized among
subjects within all groups? Apakah diberikan
treatmen ekstra sehingga sumber kesalahan
entah tetap konstan untuk semua perlakuan dan kelompok kontrol atau secara
acak di antara mata pelajaran di semua kelompok?
|
|
|
V. THE MEASUREMENT
|
NO
|
QUESTIONS:
|
TERTERA
|
SEHARUSNYA
|
|
1
|
Was
any evidence of the reliability of
the measurements given? Apakah ada bukti keandalan dari pengukuran yang diberikan?
|
|
|
|
2
|
Was any evidence of the validity of the measurements given? Apakah ada
bukti validitas dari pengukuran yang diberikan?
|
|
|
VI.
THE INTERPRETATION
|
NO
|
QUESTIONS:
|
TERTERA
|
SEHARUSNYA
|
|
1
|
Were the conclusions consistent with
the obtained results? Apakah kesimpulan yang konsisten
dengan hasil yang diperoleh?
|
|
|
|
2
|
Were the generalizations confined to
the population from which the sample was drawn? Apakah
generalisasi terbatas pada populasi dari mana sampel tersebut diambil?
|
|
|
VII.
GENERAL
|
NO
|
QUESTIONS:
|
TERTERA
|
SEHARUSNYA
|
|
1
|
Was this a significant study?
Why? (Your opinion, not graded). Apakah ini sebuah penelitian penting?
Mengapa? (Pendapat Anda, tidak bergradasi).
|
|
|
Adapted
from:
William W. Farquahr, and John D. Krumboltz, "A
Check List Evaluating Experimental Research in Psychology and Education," Journal
of Educational Research.
III (May, 1959) 353-354.
https://www.binsarinstitute.id/2024/09/critiquing-research-articles.html
123.jpg)
